Employment Law Blog

Google Employees Confront Widespread Sexual Harassment and Discrimination

December 18, 2018
The MeToo movement has led to a much-need reckoning with the effects of misogyny and unchecked power in a variety of sectors across the country, from Hollywood to political institutions. As part of this movement, technology giants have been forced to face the conditions of their industry, which is rife with sexism, sexual...

EEOC, NLRB Differ over Confidentiality of Workplace Sexual Harassment Investigations

September 13, 2018
The latest report and proposed guidance from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on how employers should respond to sexual harassment in the workplace have raised questions about the confidentiality of investigations.  Although the EEOC recommends that employers maintain the confidentiality of internal harassment...

Rideshare Services Rescind Arbitration Requirements in Cases of Sexual Assault and Harassment. But There’s Still Work to Do.

August 23, 2018
Since the New Yorker published its article exposing Harvey Weinstein’s rampant sexual harassment in October last year, the #MeToo movement has shined a national spotlight on our institutions’ failures to protect and empower survivors of sexual harassment and assault.  As the public has learned more about how the legal system...

Maternal Walls and Glass Ceilings in the #MeToo Era

July 26, 2018
Women’s advancement in the workplace is often obstructed by invisible barriers. “Maternal walls” – erected on assumptions that women will eventually become pregnant and either leave the workforce or become less productive after having children – regularly channel women into lower paying jobs during their childbearing years. And...

EEOC Pushes Boundaries of Harassment Liability in Select Staffing Lawsuit

June 29, 2018
Earlier this month, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a lawsuit on behalf of female employees of Select Staffing, a temporary staffing agency operating in Albuquerque, New Mexico, who were sexually harassed during their job placements with the Albuquerque Police Department Inspection of Public Records Act...

Changes to Sexual Harassment Law Could Help Victims in NYC, Minnesota

June 13, 2018
In the wake of the #MeToo movement, several states and localities have proposed or enacted workplace protections that are more robust than Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the federal statute prohibiting sexual harassment in the workplace. As a general rule, federal employment law sets a “floor”—that is, the minimum...

Salary History Not a Defense to Equal Pay Act Claims, 9th Circuit Says

May 16, 2018
Last month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a landmark decision in the decades-long fight against the sex-based pay gap, holding that the Equal Pay Act (the “Act”) forbids employers from considering an employee’s salary history when setting the employee’s compensation. This decision provides an immediate...

Will Nixing Arbitration in Sexual Harassment Claims Affect Other Employment Claims?

May 1, 2018
In the wake of the #MeToo movement, lawmakers and employers across the country seeking to avoid public scorn are taking steps that benefit employees who experience sexual harassment in the workplace. For instance, in December 2017, the major U.S. technology company Microsoft announced it will no longer require employees to...

$13M Jury Award Given to UCLA Doctor for Sex Discrimination, Retaliation

March 29, 2018
Last month, a former physician at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Medical Center prevailed on state law claims of sex discrimination and retaliation, for which the jury awarded $13 million, while it found against her on her claim of age discrimination. This significant award is a welcome indication that jurors...

Zarda v. Altitude Express: Another Federal Court Breakthrough on Sexual Orientation Discrimination

March 13, 2018
On Feb. 26, 2018, the Second Circuit issued an en banc opinion in Zarda v. Altitude Express, and joined the Seventh Circuit, the EEOC, and some lower federal courts in holding that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) protects employees from discrimination based on their sexual orientation. The opinion...

Pages